Statutory interpretation refers to judges interpreting the meaning of a statute to resolve a case.

Statutory interpretation refers to judges interpreting the meaning of a statute to resolve a case.

• A. Interpret the meaning of a statute to resolve a case
• B. Create new statutes
• C. Enforce constitutional rights
• D. Propose amendments to bills

Answer: (A)

The main idea is that judges determine what the words of a statute mean and then apply that meaning to the facts of a case. They work through language, context, purpose, and sometimes precedent to decide how the statute should operate in the real situation before them. This helps resolve disputes when the text is unclear, ambiguous, or when different parts of the statute seem to conflict. This description is why the statement is the best fit: statutory interpretation is exactly the process lawyers and judges use to decide how a law should be applied, rather than creating new laws, enforcing rights directly (that’s about upholding rights through the law, not about translating statutory text), or proposing changes to laws (which is the job of legislators).

The main idea is that judges determine what the words of a statute mean and then apply that meaning to the facts of a case. They work through language, context, purpose, and sometimes precedent to decide how the statute should operate in the real situation before them. This helps resolve disputes when the text is unclear, ambiguous, or when different parts of the statute seem to conflict.

This description is why the statement is the best fit: statutory interpretation is exactly the process lawyers and judges use to decide how a law should be applied, rather than creating new laws, enforcing rights directly (that’s about upholding rights through the law, not about translating statutory text), or proposing changes to laws (which is the job of legislators).